Bin Laden blasts US for climate change
Fuuuuuck. The man’s got a point. Well played, asshole.
He blamed Western industrialized nations for hunger, desertification and floods across the globe, and called for “drastic solutions” to global warming, and “not solutions that partially reduce the effect of climate change.”
Finding a Way to Pay for Green Makeovers
This is exactly the stuff I work on and it’s so encouraging to see it in The New York Times. In fact, the subject of the article, Sean Neill, is a colleague whom I’ve worked with for a few years. Last March, I helped organize a conference on green leasing; he was a speaker.
Building legislation and green leases aren’t sexy. They don’t make headlines on sites like Treehugger. But they will ensure that New York City remains the most sustainable city in North America for decades to come.
Last year, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg proposed four laws and two programs that would have required the owners of New York’s largest buildings to pay for improvements to make their properties more energy-efficient.
The City Council passed a modified version of the proposal in December that required landlords to audit their buildings’ energy use once a decade and publish the results, but made investments to reduce energy waste optional.
Building owners had questioned the feasibility of mandated improvements, arguing that they often bear the burden of paying for investments without any codified way to share costs with tenants.
Sean Neill, a 37-year-old economist who started a consulting company a year ago to address the murky question of how landlords might pay for retrofits, says change will be very difficult to achieve if it does not address the way leases are written.
What Should We Do With a Semi-Abandoned U.S. City? » INFRASTRUCTURIST
Hantz Farms will use a trellised system that’s compact, highly efficient, and tourist-friendly. It won’t be like apple picking in Massachusetts, and that’s the point. Score wants visitors to Hantz Farms to see that agriculture is not just something that takes place in the countryside. They will be able to “walk down the row pushing a baby stroller,” he promises…For the most part the farms will focus on high-margin edibles: peaches, berries, plums, nectarines, and exotic greens. Score says that the first crops are likely to be lettuce and heirloom tomatoes.
(via jayparkinsonmd, noosphere, tragos)
Can fast fashion ever be sustainable? H & M would like you to think so. Their Garden Collection, arriving in stores in March, is made from organic materials and recycled waste, including PET bottles and textiles. The pieces are undeniably lovely, but they’re designed (and priced) to be scooped up in bulk, worn once or twice, and replaced come the next season.
(Pause.)
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Seriously, have you seen the stuff?
I’ll take one in every color, s’il vous plait.
(Bad environmentalist! Bad!)
Ok. Here’s the compromise. I get to wear that dress on the left but while doing so I must promise to only attend barbecue fiestas featuring super-local, super-sustainable pork, and I must get to and from said parties in zippy cars that use very little gas. Also, as a New Yorker, I will heroically forgo California wines for French, with have a smaller carbon footprint because they’re shipped on boats.
I can live with that.
{Images via Refinery 29.}
Letter to the Editor: In New York City, a Bill to Enhance Energy Efficiency
Rohit Aggarwala, Director of the NYC Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability, explains how proposed legislation will reduce energy consumption in buildings and significantly curtail the city’s carbon footprint, while creating jobs and maintaining economic competitiveness. He spoke on these matters at a conference I helped organize last week.
Consider it a much-needed antidote to that OTHER op-ed (which I refuse to link to directly.)
Obama to Go to Copenhagen With Pledge of Emissions Cuts
Mr. Obama will tell the delegates to the climate conference that the United States intends to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions “in the range of” 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050, officials said.
Yeah, we’re fucked. Awesome gesture but not enough. And this is contingent on Congress making strict news laws against carbon pollution … not likely.
Have you seen Glenn Beck’s interview with PETA president Ingrid Newkirk? She bashes Al Gore for eating meat* and in the process brings the clumsy art of pandering to sordid new lows.
* Look, you know how I feel about this — eat less meat, and when you do, choose ethical, sustainable product. But giving up meat and fish is not going to save the planet — even if a lot of us do it. The only people who have the power to save the planet are legislators, and they will only take bold and necessary steps to cap carbon emissions and make corporations pay for their pollution if they are pressured from below. Al Gore lit and stoked that fire. Let the man have his fucking cheeseburger.
(Via Inhabitat, with hat tip to Nathan.)
Last week I had the pleasure of seeing Nobel Prize winner Al Gore speak at the American Museum of Natural History on his new book Our Choice.
I sat 3rd row center, right behind Tipper, entranced as our former vice-president gave the most inspiring, informative, entertaining talks I have ever attended. The man speaks with such experience and authority, such compassion that I cannot fathom how there are still disbelievers. Regardless, he’s given us the tools to reverse the path of the climate crisis, it’s now our job to pick up these tools and go to work!
Oh, and for the record, Letterman was right, he looks great!
Chris Jordan: Visualizing the 2.4 million pieces of plastic that enter the world’s oceans every hour. “All of the plastic in this image was collected from the Pacific Ocean.”Close up of the dark area of the wave:
via MUG.
NPR reports:
More than twenty years ago, an international treaty known as the Montreal Protocol phased out a group of chemicals that were destroying the earth’s ozone layer.
But since then, scientists have discovered that that some of the chemicals developed to replace those destructive compounds might be contributing to another problem: global warming.
These new chemicals are known as HFCs, and they’re used as coolants in refrigerators. HFCs have largely replaced older refrigerants, such as CFCs. These replacements are non-flammable and don’t hurt the ozone.
But when it comes to global warming, HFCs aren’t so good, says Kert Davies of Greenpeace.
“We call them the super greenhouse gases,” Davies says. “They’re the global warming threat that no one has really heard about.”
[…]
By 2050, LaBudde says, the global warming from HFCs could cancel out all the reductions in CO2 likely to emerge from the United Nations climate talks that will take place in Copenhagen in December.
In 2050, will we live in the world they have left us, or the world we have created?
Explore:3Qs Green Jobs Politics Action Business Findings Inspiration Design Style Food Opinion
Contact: 2050(at)shermanhome(dot)com
Created by Nora Leah Sherman
Logo by Jane Ehinger
I work on green-collar job development and greening New York City real estate at the CUNY Building Performance Lab.
A few of my favorite sites:Earth2Tech EarthFirst EcoGeek Energy Wire Ethical Living Blog Dot Earth Green Inc. GreenDaily Inhabitat No Impact Man The Sustainable Cities Blog Treehugger What On Earth World Changing
Roboturner is a free tumblr theme designed by Matt McInerney of Pixelspread
RSS
Archive
Mobile